اهداف جامعه ایرانی چیست؟ « ما چگونه فکر می کنیم» و آنچه که در ایران مهم انگاشته می شود.

‏نمایش پست‌ها با برچسب iraq. نمایش همه پست‌ها
‏نمایش پست‌ها با برچسب iraq. نمایش همه پست‌ها

۱۳۸۶ دی ۱۳, پنجشنبه

Iran no longer aids Iraq militants

By Sara A. Carter
January 3, 2008

Iran's leaders are no longer supplying weapons or training to Islamic militants in Iraq, the spokesman for the top U.S. commander in Iraq told The Washington Times.


Gen. David H. Petraeus, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, sees Iran as following through on assurances it made to Iraqi and U.S. officials last fall not to assist extremists in Iraq, spokesman Col. Steven Boylan said, adding that other U.S. officials have noted declines in Iranian weapons and funds to Iraqi insurgents.


"We are ready to confirm the excellence of the senior Iranian leadership in their pledge to stop the funding, training, equipment and resourcing of the militia special groups," Col. Boylan said. "We have seen a downward trend in the signature-type attacks using weapons provided by Iran."


In October, U.S. military officials began noticing a decrease in the supply of Iranian weapons and assistance, Col. Boylan added.


The disclosure comes just weeks after a National Intelligence Estimate pruned back its assessment of Iran's nuclear program, saying "with high confidence" that the Islamic republic had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 in the wake of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Tehran's aid for Islamic militias in Iraq and its nuclear program have resulted in calls from some in Washington for military action against Iran, and these two developments are likely to dampen such calls.


Some outside analysts have argued, though, that Iran-based aid may be getting to Iraqi insurgents without the approval of the government in Tehran.


But the colonel cautioned that while Iran's efforts are promising, U.S. military officials remain wary, partly over some contrary events on the ground in Iraq.


For example, he disclosed that U.S. troops "recently captured individuals who have been in Iran, training, as short as 45-60 days ago." He did not elaborate on the circumstances surrounding the captured individuals or the possible investigation.

۱۳۸۶ مرداد ۷, یکشنبه

Third of Iraqis 'need urgent aid'

Iraqis try to get the attention of a US soldier giving out boxes of food and blankets in Baghdad
Oxfam say basic services cannot meet the needs of the Iraqi people
Nearly a third of the population of Iraq is in need of immediate emergency aid, according to a new report from Oxfam and a coalition of Iraqi NGOs.

The report said the Iraqi government was failing to provide basic essentials such as water, sanitation, food, and shelter to up to eight million people.

It warned the continuing violence was masking a humanitarian crisis that had grown worse since the invasion in 2003.

It also found that four million Iraqis had been uprooted by the violence.

More than two million people have been displaced inside the country, while a further two million have fled to neighbouring countries, according to the report.

On Thursday, an international conference in Jordan pledged to help the refugees with their difficulties.

'Dire poverty'

The BBC's Nicholas Witchell in Baghdad says the report by the UK-based charity and the NGO Co-ordination Committee in Iraq (NCCI) makes alarming reading.

OXFAM/NCCI REPORT IN FULL
Most computers will open PDF documents automatically, but you may need to download Adobe Acrobat Reader.

The survey recognises that armed conflict is the greatest problem facing Iraqis, but finds a population "increasingly threatened by disease and malnutrition".

It suggests that 70% of Iraq's 26.5m population are without adequate water supplies, compared to 50% percent prior to the invasion. Only 20% have access to effective sanitation.

Nearly 30% of children are malnourished, a sharp increase on the situation four years ago. Some 15% of Iraqis regularly cannot afford to eat.

The report also said 92% of Iraq's children suffered from learning problems.

Displaced Iraqi family
Millions of Iraqis have been forced to flee the violence, either to another part of Iraq or abroad - many of those are living in dire poverty
Jeremy Hobbs
Director of Oxfam International

"Basic services, ruined by years of war and sanctions, cannot meet the needs of the Iraqi people," the director of Oxfam International, Jeremy Hobbs, said.

"Millions of Iraqis have been forced to flee the violence, either to another part of Iraq or abroad. Many of those are living in dire poverty."

Mr Hobbs said that despite the violence, the Iraqi government and the international community could do more to meet people's needs.

"The Iraqi government must commit to helping Iraq's poorest citizens, including the internally displaced, by extending food parcel distribution and cash payments to the vulnerable," he said.

"Western donors must work through Iraqi and international aid organisations and develop more flexible systems to ensure these organisations operate effectively and efficiently."

Oxfam has not operated in Iraq since 2003 for security reasons.

عراق، قهرمان آسيا شد

تيم ملي فوتبال عراق با پيروزي يک بر صفر مقابل عربستان عنوان قهرماني جام ملتهاي آسيا را از آن خود کرد.

تيم ملي فوتبال عراق و عربستان در فينال چهاردهمين دوره رقابتهاي جام ملتهاي آسيا به مصاف يکديگر رفتند که در پايان نود دقيقه تلاش، تيم ملي عراق موفق شد با تک گل يونس محمود در دقيقه 71 حريف قدرتمند خود را شکست دهد و جام قهرماني را بالاي سر ببرد.

شاگردان ويرا (سرمربي عراق) در اين ديدار بازي کاملا برتري را نسبت به حريف متمول خود انجام دادند و در طول دقايق بازي موقعيتهاي بيشماري داشتند که نتوانستند از آنها به خوبي استفاده کنند تا در نهايت عراق با تک گل يونس محمود عنوان قهرماني را از آن خود کند.

گفتني است چهاردهمين دوره رقابتهاي جام ملتهاي آسيا با قهرماني عراق، نايب قهرماني عربستان و سومي کره جنوبي به پايان رسيد.

۱۳۸۶ تیر ۲۰, چهارشنبه

Lieberman : We are winning in Iraq

CNN’s Ware: ‘Lieberman Has Taken An Excursion Into Fantasy’ »

After returning from a recent visit to Iraq, Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has embarked on a campaign to give cheery reports about the Iraq war. His latest line: “We are winning.” Yesterday, Lieberman alleged that U.S. troops had successfully “chased out” the “enemy”:

[W]e’ve got the enemy, Al Qaeda, on the run. We’ve chased them out of Anbar province, where they were going to create the capital for the Islamist Republic of Iraq. We’ve chased them now to Diyala. All of this is possible because of the surge.

Last night, CNN Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware, who has been in Iraq for four years, mocked Lieberman’s claims, emphasizing that the U.S. now faces “a whole multitude” of threats that are becoming stronger:

COOPER: Is the enemy on the run in Iraq, Michael?

WARE: No, certainly not. And I think we need to be aware that it’s enemies. I mean, America doesn’t face just one opponent in this country, but a whole multitude, many of whom are becoming stronger the longer the U.S. occupation here, or presence here, in Iraq continues. So, unfortunately, I’m afraid that Senator Lieberman has taken an excursion into fantasy.

Watch it:

Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) said yesterday: “I don’t know where Lieberman gets his opinions” on Iraq. Last weekend, violence around the country claimed 220 lives. Yesterday, the formerly secure Green Zone saw its “most intense mortar attack to date,” according to a statement from the U.S. embassy.

۱۳۸۶ تیر ۱۴, پنجشنبه

استرالیا به 'نفت عراق نظر داشته است

'
جان هوارد نخست وزیر استرالیا
هوارد: می خواهیم به مردم عراق امکان برخورداری از دموکراسی را داده باشیم
یک مقام ارشد دولت استرالیا اذعان کرده است که مشارکت این کشور در جنگ عراق انگیزه اقتصادی داشته است.

روز پنجشنبه، 5 ژوئیه، برندون نلسون، وزیر دفاع استرالیا، با اعلام انتشار گزارشی درباره استراتژی دفاعی این کشور گفت که "حفظ امنیت منابع" انرژی خاورمیانه یکی از اولویت های اصلی مشارکت در جنگ عراق بوده است.

آقای نلسون که در یک مصاحبه رادیویی شرکت داشت افزود که نه تنها عراق، بلکه تمامی منطقه خاورمیانه، دارای منابع مهم انرژی به خصوص نفت است و امنیت منطقه برای اطمینان از امنیت منابع انرژی استرالیا اهمیت دارد.

در پی پخش اظهارات برندون نلسون، جان هوارد، نخست وزیر استرالیا، کوشید اظهارات وزیر دفاع کابینه خود را تعدیل کند.

آقای هوارد این نظر را که نفت عراق انگیزه استرالیا از حضور نظامی در این کشور بوده است "اغراق آمیز" توصیف کرد.

نخست وزیر استرالیا گفت که "ما به خاطر نفت به عراق نرفتیم و به خاطر نفت در این کشور نمانده ایم."
.

نیروهای استرالیایی در عراق
دولت استرالیا تصمیمی برای خروج نظامی از عراق ندارد

آقای هوارد گفت که "همه می دانند خاورمیانه تامین کننده بخش عمده نفت جهان است اما دلیل اینکه ما در آنجا می مانیم این است که می خواهیم به مردم عراق امکان برخورداری از دموکراسی را داده باشیم."

اظهارات وزیر دفاع استرالیا باعث آغاز مجدد این اتهام شده است که دلیل حمله نیروهای تحت رهبری آمریکا به بهانه از میان بردن خطر تسلیحات کشتار جمعی رژیم سابق این کشور در واقع دستیابی به نفت این کشور بوده است.

رهبر حزب کارگر - حزب اصلی مخالف در پارلمان - با استناد به سخنان وزیر دفاع، مجددا سیاست دولت آقای هوارد در عراق را هدف انتقاد شدید قرار داده است.

همچنین، گروه های مخالف جنگ عراق گفته اند که "اعتراف وزیر دفاع" انگیزه واقعی آمریکا از حمله به عراق را آشکار ساخته است.

ارتش استرالیا در حمله نظامی به عراق در سال 2003 شرکت داشت و در حال حاضر نیز واحدهایی متشکل از حدود 1500 نظامی این کشور در عراق حضور دارند.

دولت استرالیا برنامه ای برای بازگرداندن فوری نیروهای خود از عراق ندارد.

در مورد خروج نظامیان خارجی از عراق، آقای نلسون گفت که به نفع امنیت استرالیاست که نیروهای غربی تنها زمانی از منطقه خاورمیانه به طور اعم، و عراق به طور اخص، خارج شوند که امنیت و ثبات در این منطقه برقرار شده باشد.

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۳۰, چهارشنبه

Iraqi Orphanage Nightmare

Exclusive: U.S. And Iraqi Troops Discover And Rescue Orphan Boys Left Starving, Chained To Beds

It was a scene that shocked battle-hardened soldiers, captured in photographs obtained exclusively by CBS News.

On a daytime patrol in central Baghdad just over than a week ago, a U.S. military advisory team and Iraqi soldiers happened to look over a wall and found something horrific.

"They saw multiple bodies laying on the floor of the facility," Staff Sgt. Mitchell Gibson of the 82nd Airborne Division told CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan. "They thought they were all dead, so they threw a basketball (to) try and get some attention, and actually one of the kids lifted up their head, tilted it over and just looked and then went back down. And they said, 'oh, they're alive' and so they went into the building."

Inside the building, a government-run orphanage for special needs children, the soldiers found more emaciated little bodies tied to the cribs. They had been kept this way for more than a month, according to the soldiers called in to rescue the 24 boys.

"I saw children that you could see literally every bone in their body that were so skinny, they had no energy to move whatsoever, no expression on their face," Staff Sgt. Michael Beale said.

"The kids were tied up, naked, covered in their own waste — feces — and there were three people that were cooking themselves food, but nothing for the kids," Lt. Stephen Duperre said.

Logan asked: So there were three people cooking their own food?

"They were in the kitchen, yes ma'am," Duperre said.

With all these kids starving around them?

"Yes ma'am," Duperre said.

It didn't stop there. The soldiers found kitchen shelves packed with food and in the stockroom, rows of brand-new clothing still in their plastic wrapping.

Instead of giving it to the boys, the soldiers believe it was being sold to local markets.

The man in charge, the orphanage caretaker, had a well-kept office — a stark contrast to the terrible conditions just outside that room.

"I got extremely angry with the caretaker when I got there," Capt. Benjamin Morales said. "It took every muscle in my body to restrain myself from not going after that guy."

He has since disappeared and is believed to be on the run. But two security guards are in custody, arrested on the orders of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. Two women also working there, who posed for pictures in front of the naked boys as if there was nothing wrong, have also disappeared.

"My first thought when I walked in there was shock, and then I got a little angry that they were treating kids like that, then that's when everybody just started getting upset," Capt. Jim Cook said. "There were people crying. It was definitely a bad emotional scene."

There was nothing more emotional than finding one boy who Army medics did not expect to survive. For Gibson, that was the hardest part:

Seeing a boy who was at the orphanage, where Logan reported from, "with thousands of flies covering his body, unable to move any part of his body, you know we had to actually hold his head up and tilt his head to make sure that he was OK, and the only thing basically that was moving was his eyeballs," Gibson explained. "Flies in the mouth, in the eyes, in the nose, ears, eating all the open wounds from sleeping on the concrete."

All that, and the boy was laying in the boiling sun — temperatures of 120 degrees or so, according to Gibson.

Looking at the boy today, as he sits up in his crib without help, it is hard to believe he is the same boy, one week later — now clean and being cared for along with all the other boys in a different orphanage located only a few minutes away from where they suffered their ordeal.

Another little boy right shown in the photos was carried out of the orphanage by Beale. He was very emaciated.

"I picked him up and then immediately the kid started smiling, and as I got a little bit closer to the ambulance he just started laughing. It was almost like he completely understood what was going on," Beale said.

When CBS News visited the orphanage with the soldiers, it was clear the boys had been starved of human contact as much as anything else, Logan said. Some still had marks on their ankles from where they were tied. Since only one boy can talk, it's impossible to know what terrible memories they might have locked away.

The memory of what he saw when he helped rescue the boys that night haunts Ali Soheil, the local council head, who wept during the interview.

Later at the hospital, Lt. Jason Smith brushed teeth and helped clean up the boys. He and his wife are both special education teachers, and he was proud to tell her what the soldiers had done.

"She said that one day was worth my entire deployment," Smith said. "It makes the whole thing worthwhile."

This is a tough test for the Iraqi government: How a nation cares for its most vulnerable is one of the most important benchmarks for the health of any society.


CBC's Video

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۲۷, یکشنبه

Military mental health disorders spike.

Military mental health disorders spike

“Mental health disorders are snowballing as more and more soldiers and Marines are sent back for repeat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan,” CBS News reports.

According to the Pentagon’s latest mental health survey, 31 percent of Marines, 38 percent of soldiers and 49 percent of the National Guard reported psychological symptoms such as anger, depression or alcohol abuse after returning home. As the director of the survey said, combat stress is not something you just get over.

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۲۳, چهارشنبه

Samarra Revered Shrine Blown Up

SAMARRA , Iraq, June 13, 2007

Insurgents on Wednesday blew up the two minarets of a revered shrine in the northern town of Samarra.


Unknown insurgents blew up at about 09:00 a.m. two shrines of the Imam Ali al-Hadi and the al-Hasan al-Askari shrines (peace be upon them) by roadside bombs, totally damaging the minaret of the two shrines.

Earlier, several mortar rounds landed near the two shrines, but no casualties and damaging were reported immediately.

On Feb. 22 of 2006, the Shiite shrine of Ali al-Hadi, also called the Golden Mosque, was attacked by a bomb, with its 100-year-old golden dome badly damaged.

The shrine of Imam Ali al-Hadi (PBUH) is one of the four most revered shrines in Iraq.

It contains two tombs of Imam Ali al-Hadi, who Has been martyred in 868 A.D., and Imam Hassan al-Askari who has been martyred in 874 A.D.

The two are the 10th and 11th of the Shiite's twelve most revered Imams.

A top Iraqi official said the tall structures of the shrine of Imam Hadi and Imam Hassan Askari (Peace Be Upon Them) came down at around 9:00 am local time.

Sheikh Saleh al-Haidiri, head of the endowment administrative body responsible for shrines in Iraq, said the minarets were blown up by "terrorists".

"It is a terrorist attack ... the second one against the shrine," Haidiri said in Baghdad, adding It is a terrorist attack aimed at sparking sectarian Violence."

On February 22, 2006, alleged Al-Qaeda insurgents bombed the shrine in an attack which triggered brutal nationwide clashes that are still continuing.

The mosque compound and minarets remained intact, and have been guarded since then by Iraqi police and commandos.

The US military headquarters in the area had no immediate information about Wednesday's attack.

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۱۳, یکشنبه

Saddam Hussein

Saddam Hussein - The Trial you will never see


Saddam Brutality Against Shia


Saddam's Killing Fields [Part 3]

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۷, دوشنبه

ايران مذاکره با آمريکا را مثبت ارزيابی کرد


پس از آنکه در پايان نخستين مذاکرات رسمی ايران و آمريکا در عراق، سفير ايالات متحده در بغداد مطالب مطرح شده در اين مذاکرات را با خبرنگاران در ميان گذاشت، سفير ايران نيز در جمع خبرنگاران حاضر شد و جزئيات بيشتری در اين زمينه مطرح کرد.

حسن کاظمی قمی، سفير ايران در عراق که طی 27 سال اخير نخستين مقام مذاکره کننده رسمی ايران با آمريکاييها شده است، نتيجه اين مذاکرات را مثبت ارزيابی کرد و گفت در اين مذاکرات تشکیل کمیته ای امنیتی با حضور سه طرف ايرانی، آمريکايی و عراقی به منظور تقویت بنیه نظامی و دفاعی عراق مطرح و بررسی شده و هر سه طرف بر سر حمایت از دولت عراق و "اهتمام برای کمک به بازگشت حاکمیت این کشور بر اداره امور ملی خود" توافق کرده اند.

ناکافی دانستن اقدامات آمريکا در آموزش و تجهيز ارتش عراق موضوعی است که رايان کروکر، سفير آمريکا در بغداد به مطرح شدن آن در گفتگوهايش با حسن کاظمی قمی اشاره کرده بود.

هرچند آقای کروکر افزوده بود که آقای کاظمی قمی و هیئت همراهش جزئیات بیشتری در مورد رویکرد خود نسبت به بحران امنیتی عراق مطرح نکردند.

سفير ايران در عراق گفت به همتای آمريکايی اش گفته است که ارتش عراق به دليل نداشتن تجهیزات لازم برای مقابله با تروریستها در پایان بخشیدن به مصائب عراق با مشکل روبرو شده و دولت ایران آماده کمکهای همه جانبه در جهت افزايش توان دولت عراق در اداره امور اين کشور است.

آقای کاظمی همچنين گفته در مذاکره با سفير آمريکا آنچه دولت ايران اشتباهات آمريکا در اداره امور عراق می خواند را بصراحت مطرح کرده و در مقابل به تمامی مواردی که آمريکا آنها را دخالت ايران در عراق می داند "پاسخ مقتضی" داده است.

مذاکرات رايان کروکر و حسن کاظمی قمی در سه جلسه و به مدت چهار ساعت به طول انجاميد، آن گونه که طرفين گفته اند دولت عراق خواهان ادامه اين گفتگوهاست که قرار است پاسخ دولتهای ايران و آمريکا به درخواست دولت عراق بعداً اعلام شود.

مذاکرات ايران و آمريکا در دفتر نوری مالکی، نخست وزیر عراق انجام گرفت و آقای مالکی در آغاز گفتگوها حضور داشت و پس از آن نيز هوشيار زيباری، وزيرخارجه عراق و تنی چند تن از مقامات عراقی در مذاکرات حضور داشتند.

آن گونه که هر دو طرف ايرانی و آمريکايی اعلام کردند، مسئله پنج شهروند ايرانی که در بازداشت نظاميان آمريکايی در عراق به سر می برند در گفتگوهای بغداد مطرح نشد.

سفير ايران گفته که در اين مورد، دولت ايران با دولت عراق طرف است و مسئوليت را متوجه عراقيها می داند.

Iran offers to train Iraqi forces

Mon, 28 May 2007

Iran' ambassador to Iraq has offered weapons and training to the Iraqi army, stating the US has not been able to help Baghdad defend itself.

"The Iraqi government is in need of strong military and security structure to confront its security problems and we have offered all forms of assistance such as weapons, training and equipment," Hassan Kazemi Qomi said following a meeting with his US counterpart.

While describing the meeting, the first of its kind in nearly three decades, as "positive", Kazemi Qomi told US ambassador Ryan Crocker that the Iraqi army was not receiving the weapons it needed, AFP reported.

Crocker, for his part, reiterated US accusations that the Iranians were funneling weapons and sophisticated explosives to Iraq's militias.

"The negotiations today were an important first step between the two sides," Kazemi Qomi told reporters. "The Iraqi government said it will invite the two sides to resume negotiations and we received this proposal positively."

Kazemi Qomi, however, added that he would have to consult with Tehran first, and one of his assistants said no date had been set for the follow-up meeting. "If it is possible, it will happen," the assistant said.

Crocker earlier pointed out that further meetings were not necessarily the solution to Iraq's continuing crisis.

متن كامل سخنان كاظمي‌قمي در ديدار با كروكر

نماينده ايران در گفت‌وگوهاي بغداد مواضع جمهوري اسلامي را درباره عراق براي حل مشكلات اين كشور تشريح كرد.

به گزارش فارس، دور اول گفت‌وگوي ميان سفير جمهوري اسلامي ايران و سفير آمريكا در عراق صبح امروز دوشنبه با حضور مقامات عاليرتبه عراقي برگزار شد.

درجلسه افتتاحيه امروز علاوه بر اعضاي 2 هيات ايراني و آمريكايي، رئيس پارلمان عراق، معاونين نخست وزير و وزير امور خارجه عراق حضورداشتند كه روساي 2 هيات ايراني و آمريكايي و مقامات عراقي به سخنراني پرداختند.
متن كامل سخنراني حسن كاظمي قمي سفير جمهوري اسلامي ايران و رئيس هيات ايراني در اين گفت‌وگوها به اين شرح است:

«در آغاز سخن فرصت را مغتنم شمرده و مراتب قدرداني خود را از ميزباني دولت عراق و جناب آقاي مالكي كه در نظر دارد با ديدگاهي واقع بينانه و در چهارچوب همكاري مشترك راهكارهاي مناسب برون رفت از چالش‌هاي فراروي عراق را بيابد، ابراز مي‌دارم و حمايت قاطع و پشتيباني كامل جمهوري اسلامي ايران را از دولت و ملت عراق در همه زمينه‌هاي سياسي، اقتصادي و امنيتي مورد تاكيد قرار مي‌دهم
جمهوري اسلامي ايران به عنوان همسايه عراق با برخورداري از روابط ديرينه فرهنگي، مذهبي و تاريخي ميان دو ملت و طولاني‌ترين مرزهاي آبي و خاكي، اوضاع و تحولات اين كشور را همواره با دقت پيگيري نموده و بر احترام به تماميت ارضي، حفظ وحدت داخلي و ارتقاي ثبات و امنيت در اين كشور تاكيد مي‌نمايد.

جمهوري اسلامي ايران عليرغم متحمل شدن خسارات فراوان مادي و معنوي در اثر تجاوز رژيم صدام، همواره در كنار مردم و معارضين بوده و از هيچ گونه همكاري در راستاي احقاق حقوق مردم عراق دريغ نورزيده است. ضمن اينكه بدليل سياست‌هاي غير انساني رژيم صدام، بيش از سه دهه ميزبان حدود دو ميليون پناه جوي عراقي بود. علاوه بر خدمات انساني، بدنبال تجاوزات رژيم صدام، جمهوري اسلامي ايران در پي درخواست مبارزان عراقي از مبارزات حق طلبانه ملت عراق عليه رژيم فاشيست ضد بشري صدام حمايت نمود.

بدون ترديد حمايت گسترده و بي‌دريغ جمهوري اسلامي ايران از احزاب و گروه‌هاي مبارز كرد، سني و شيعه عراقي موجب ادامه حيات سياسي و استمرار مبارزه آنان عليه رژيم صدام گرديد. ضمن اينكه رژيم صدام همواره تلاش مي‌نمود تا ضمن سركوب مبارزين عراقي از گروهك تروريستي شناخته شده منافقين عليه مردم عراق و جمهوري اسلامي ايران بهره برداري نمايد.

كشف گورستان‌هاي دسته جمعي مملو از اجساد مردم مظلوم عراقي كه بخش عمده آن متعلق به اكراد و شيعيان بود از جمله جنايات رژيم صدام به شمار مي‌رود كه در راستاي قيام مردمي انتفاضه در سال 1991 م به وقوع پيوست. حركت و قيام مردمي كه در پي تهاجم صدام به كويت و شروع حملات آمريكا و متحدين آن عليه تجاوز صدام آغاز گرديد و به سرعت گسترش يافت، ليكن متاسفانه توقف اين عمليات توسط آمريكا و متحدين موجب كشتار وسيع مردم عراق اعم از كرد و شيعه (و حتي بخشي از جامعه سني) گرديد.
همچنين عمليات انفال در كردستان عراق توسط رژيم كه بيانگر نمونه‌هايي از ددمنشي‌هاي رژيم صدام است و در اين دو مقطع جمهوري اسلامي ايران همانند مقاطع ديگر به كمك مبارزين و مردم عراق شتافته و بخش عظيمي از آوارگان (حدود 5/1 ميليون نفر) را در خود جاي داد و از آنان حمايت و ياري نمود.

جامعه جهاني به خوبي واقف است كه طي جنگ تحميلي رژيم بعث عليه جمهوري اسلامي ايران و هشت سال دفاع مقدس جمهوري اسلامي ايران، رژيم صدام به كرات از سلاح‌هاي ممنوعه‌اي همچون سلاح‌هاي ميكروبي و شيميايي عليه ملت ايران استفاده نمود. اما جمهوري اسلامي ايران بر مبناي وظيفه ديني و انساني خود حتي براي يك بار از حق مقابله به مثل استفاده نكرد چرا كه آن را مغاير با احكام شرع اسلام و همچنين مصالح و منافع مردم مظلوم عراق مي‌دانست.
همانگونه كه اشاره شد جمهوري اسلامي ايران قبل از سقوط رژيم صدام، از مبارزه رهايي بخش و معارضين عراقي، اعم از كرد، شيعه و سني حمايت نمود و آنان را در جهت ايجاد وحدت و كمك به ساقط كردن صدام پشتيباني كرد. در اين راستا نشست‌ها و اجلاس‌هاي مهمي متشكل از رهبران عراقي درتهران، ديانا و صلاح الدين، بر پايه سه محور اساسي وحدت عراق، وحدت رهبران عراقي و ايجاد يك راهكار منطقي كه همه طيف‌ها و رهبران را براي اداره امور عراق در بر گيرد، شكل داد.

به همين دليل پس از سقوط صدام، تشكيل شوراي حكومتي (مجلس حكم) از مهمترين دستاوردهايي بود كه به شدت مورد حمايت جمهوري اسلامي ايران قرار گرفت. تشكيل اين شورا از توصيه‌هاي اكيد جمهوري اسلامي ايران به دوستان عراقي بود به همين منظور جمهوري اسلامي ايران با اعزام هيئت و حضور در صلاح الدين ضمن كمك به شكل دهي اجلاس رهبران، نسبت به تشكيل مجلس حكم به گونه‌اي كه همه رهبران موثر كرد، سني و شيعه و حتي مسيحي را در برگيرد كمك شاياني نمود. با تشكيل شوراي حكومتي، جمهوري اسلامي ايران بلافاصله هيئت بلند پايه‌اي را با هدف تاييد و حمايت از فرآيند سياسي به عراق اعزام نمود و اين اعزام در شرايطي صورت پذيرفت كه مخالفت بسياري از كشورها از فرايند سياسي و شوراي حكومتي را به همراه داشت.

جمهوري اسلامي ايران همانند دوران مبارزه ملت عراق، تاييد و حمايت همه جانبه خود را از تلاش رهبران، مراجع ديني و مردم، اعم از كرد، شيعه و سني و مسيحي در فرايند سياسي در عراق جديد، يعني شكل گيري شوراي حكومتي، حكومت موقت، دولت انتقالي، انتخابات مجلس ملي، رفراندوم قانون اساسي، تاسيس مجلس نيابي و تشكيل دولت، ادامه و كمك به دولت منتخب دائمي در ايفاي وظايف اساسي خود در سه پروسه سياسي، امنيتي، بازسازي و خدمات رساني را در سرلوحه خود قرار داد، كه به اختصار بخشي از آن مورد اشاره قرار مي‌گيرد:

- اعزام هيأت‌هاي بلند پايه از جمله دو وزير امور خارجه و دبير شورايعالي امنيت ملي كشور به عراق
-دعوت از رهبران و شخصيت‌هاي سياسي، احزاب و گروهها و تشويق آنان براي مشاركت در فرايند سياسي و دولت سازي
-ارتقاء سطح روابط به سفارت

-افتتاح سركنسولگري جمهوري اسلامي ايران در شهرهاي مختلف عراق (عليرغم وجود فضاي ناامن حاكم بر عراق، به شهادت رسيدن دبير اول سفارت ج.ا. ايران در بغداد و دستگيري ديپلمات‌هاي ايراني)
-حمايت بي‌دريغ دولت در كمك به ارائه خدمات به مردم عراق، از جمله انتقال برق كه به زودي به ميزان 500 مگاوات افزايش خواهد يافت و تا 1620 مگاوات قابل ارتقاء خواهد بود

- تامين نيازمندي‌ها در زمينه سوخت از جمله نفت سفيد، بنزين و گازوئيل
- كمك‌هاي انسان دوستانه به ميزان شش هزار تن در زمان سقوط رژيم صدام
-اعطاي وام يك ميليارد دلاري

- انتقال داوطلبانه بخش اعظم آوارگان و ادامه زندگي مناسب بيش از 350 هزار اتباع عراقي در ايران
- راه‌اندازي خطوط پروازي تهران ـ بغداد
- كنترل مرزها و عهده دار شدن نقش نيابتي در كنترل، حفظ و حراست از مرزها
- ايجاد بازارچه‌هاي مرزي مورد نياز عراق

- كمك‌هاي توسعه اي، سرمايه گذاري، تجارت و گردشگري
- بازسازي عتبات عاليات
- احياي صنعت توريسم عراق
- كمك به اجراي پروژه‌هاي بازسازي در كردستان عراق و ساير مناطق

بنابراين با مروري بر عملكرد خدماتي وارتباطات جمهوري اسلامي ايران در دو مقطع قبل و پس از سقوط رژيم صدام به خوبي مشهود است كه نقش جمهوري اسلامي ايران در حمايت از مردم و دولت عراق، نقشي بي‌بديل و مهم بوده است.
جمهوري اسلامي ايران معتقد است، امروز هم، متاسفانه مردم عراق همچنان مواجه با رنج‌ها و مشقات فراواني بوده و كمتر ملتي را مي‌توان يافت كه همانند مردم عراق دچار چنين رنج ومحنتي باشند و اين در حالي است كه عراق كشوري ثروتمند، داراي تاريخ و تمدني كهن و برخوردار از شخصيت‌هاي كم نظيري مي‌باشد كه تاثيرگذاري آن در جهان عرب، اسلام و منطقه بسيار مشهود مي‌باشد.

هم اكنون اين ملت فرهيخته با داشتن سرزميني غني و بهره‌مند از مواهب خدادادي، به دليل عملكرد نادرست و طولاني مدت آمريكا در تداوم وضعيت فعلي اشغال عراق، با مشكلات فراواني مواجه گرديده است. استمرار فضاي ناامني، كشتار بي‌گناهان، تخريب كليه زيربناهاي اقتصادي، برق، صنايع و نفت، بدليل فقدان يك ساختار دفاعي و امنيتي قوي در برابر تجاوزات و اقدامات تخريبي و تروريستي و عدم اختيارات كافي دولت در بكارگيري قواي مسلح و عدم شناخت نيروهاي عمل كننده بيگانه از فرهنگ و حساسيت‌هاي ديني و برخي شيوه‌هاي عملكرد ناصحيح موجب گرديده است تا ضمن ايجاد بد بيني‌هاي قومي - مذهبي، تاثير طرح‌هاي امنيتي را در برقراري امنيت تضعيف نمايد.

ما متعجب هستيم كه چرا مي‌بايست تجهيزات ارتش و پليس عراق ضعيف‌تر از گروه‌هاي تروريستي باشد و ارتش و پليس سلاح‌هاي لازم براي دفاع از خود و ملت را نداشته باشند ؟ چگونه ممكن است نيروهاي مسلح عراق بتوانند در چنين شرايطي بر گروههاي تروريستي كه مجهزترشده‌اند فائق آيند ؟ انگيزه عدم تجهيز ارتش و پليس عراق چيست ؟ از سوي ديگر وجود شركت‌هاي شخصي امنيتي متعدد كه همچون پيمانكاران ساختماني عمل مي‌كنند، وضع امنيتي در عراق را پيچيده و اين كشور را در لبه پرتگاه سقوط قرار داده است. اين امر موجب شده است تروريست‌ها با خيال راحت مردم عراق را بصورت گروهي به قتل برسانند.
علاوه بر آن به دليل ناامني در عراق شاخص‌هاي زندگي، بشدت كاهش يافته است، كه از جمله مي‌توان به كمبود خدمات رساني در زمينه‌هاي حياتي مانند آب، برق و سوخت اشاره نمود كه اين امر شرايط سختي را بر اين ملت مظلوم تحميل نموده است.

جمهوري اسلامي ايران به عنوان يكي از كشورهاي همسايه و مسلمان عراق با داشتن مرزهاي مشترك طولاني (بيش از 1300 كيلومتر)، مشتركات ديني و فرهنگي و برخورداري از تعاملات تاريخي و مردمي، منافع مشترك با مردم عراق و تاثيرپذيري متقابل از تحولات يكديگر، خود را در رنج و غم اين مردم شريك مي‌داند و حفظ دستاوردهاي ملت مظلوم عراق را كه تجلي آن در ايجاد يك حكومت دمكراتيك متبلور گرديده است، از رسالت‌هاي اساسي خود به شمار مي‌آورد و ثبات وامنيت در عراق را عامل مهمي بر تقويت ثبات و امنيت در منطقه دانسته و بي‌ثباتي و ناامني عراق را عامل مهمي در تخريب ثبات و امنيت در سطح منطقه و گسترش تروريسم و تهديد امنيت جهاني مي‌داند.

جمهوري اسلامي ايران ضمن تاكيد بر ضرورت حفظ وحدت ملي و حفظ تماميت ارضي و حمايت از روند دموكراسي و سياست ملي عراق و اهميت همزيستي مسالمت آميز تمامي قوميت‌ها و مذاهب در عراق، بارها آمادگي خود را در كمك به دولت منتخب ملي عراق اعلام نموده است و مجددا بر اين آمادگي با توجه به شناخت از مشكلات عراق و تجربه امنيتي طولاني كشورمان تاكيد دارد.
در چنين شرايط حساسي كه عراق با اشغال طولاني و رفتار ناصحيح آنان از يك سو و ناامني تروريست‌ها از سوي ديگر و همچنين در هم شكستن زير ساخت‌ها و افول وضعيت اقتصادي ملت مواجه است، دولت جمهوري اسلامي ايران براي احقاق حقوق ملت عزيز عراق، هر گونه حمايت از دولت دموكراتيك منتخب عراق به رياست آقاي مالكي را وظيفه خود دانسته و اميدواريم اين نشست منجر به سيادت هر چه سريعتر ملت عراق و پايان دادن به ناامني‌ها و سرعت يافتن روند بازسازي كشور شود».

كروكر در پايان مذاكره با ايران: مي‌دانيم ايراني‌ها در عراق هستند!
سفير آمريكا در عراق در پايان گفت‌وگوهاي خود با سفير ايران در بغداد طي كنفرانس خبري اعلام كرد: ما در اين گفت و گو نيامده بوديم كه دلايل اثبات‌ كننده‌اي براي فعاليت‌ ايراني‌ها در عراق ارايه بدهيم، بلكه ما خود مي‌دانيم كه ايراني‌ها در عراق هستند و فعاليت مي‌كنند.

به گزارش ايسنا به نقل از شبكه‌ تلويزيوني الجزيره، رايان كروكر، سفير آمريكا در عراق طي كنفرانس كوتاهي پس از پايان نشست چهار ساعته‌ي ايران و آمريكا به پرسش برخي از خبرنگاران خارجي پاسخ گفت.

وي در پاسخ به سوال خبرنگاري مبني بر آن كه آيا در اين ديدار پيامي نسبت به تمايل آمريكا يا خواست آمريكا براي برقراري و عادي‌سازي روابط با ايران ارايه شد و هم‌چنين از ايران به آمريكا، گفت: همان طور كه مي‌دانيد از مهمترين نقاط توافق دو جانبه براي برگزاري اين گفت و گو آن بود كه محور اصلي اين گفت وگو بر مسايل داخلي عراق متمركز باشد. بنابراين هيچ گونه گفت و گويي در اين زمينه كه بتواند گوياي ارايه‌ يك پيام باشد انجام نگرفت.

كروكر همچنين در پاسخ به سوال ديگري مبني بر آن كه شما پيش از اين گفت و گو اعلام كرده‌ بوديد كه درباره‌ فعاليت‌هاي ايراني‌ها در عراق و ورود اسلحه از ايران به عراق گفت و گو خواهيد كرد، گفت: هدف اصلي ما آن بود كه در اين زمينه تلاش بيشتري داشته باشيم ودر اين ارتباط سخن بگوييم اما طرف ايراني آمادگي اين موضوع را نداشت همچنين ما آمده‌ بوديم كه بگوييم اين گونه فعاليت‌ها در عراق از سوي ايران نه تنها براي عراق بلكه براي تمامي منطقه خطرناك است.

سفير آمريكا در بغداد همچنين گفت: به هر حال ما نيامده بوديم كه در اين گفت‌وگو مدارك و اسناد جهت اثبات فعاليت ايراني‌ها در عراق ارايه بدهيم؛ زيرا كه ما مي‌دانيم ايراني‌ها درعراق هستند و فعال مي‌باشند.

كروكر تاكيد كرد: همان طوري كه همه مي‌دانند اين شايسته نيست كه ديپلمات‌ها بخواهند درباره‌ موضوعي به صورت عميق و گسترده توضيح بدهند و من نيز مبادرت به چنين كاري نمي‌كنم.

وي همچنين گفت: دولت عراق در اين گفت و گوي دو جانبه حضور داشت و اين دولت اين گفت‌وگوها را رهبري مي‌كرد.

سفير آمريكا همچنين تاكيد كرد: موضوع اصلي اين گفت و گوها بيشتر در ارتباط با مسائل داخلي عراق و نحوه‌ حل و فصل كردن اين موضوع متمركز بود.

وي همچنين عنوان داست: اين ديدار چهار ساعته ديدار كاري بوده و توافق گسترده‌اي بر سر سياست‌گذاري در عراق صورت گرفت. ايران بايد رفتارش را تغيير داده و كمك به شبه‌نظاميان، آموزش و تامين بودجه آنها را متوقف كند.

U.S., Iran reach Iraq policy consensus

By STEVEN R. HURST,
Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD - The United States ambassador in Baghdad said he and his Iranian counterpart agreed broadly on policy toward Iraq during four-hour groundbreaking talks on Monday, but insisted that Iran end its support for militants.

The Iranian ambassador later said the two sides would meet again in less than a month.

Hassan Kazemi Qomi, the Iranian envoy, also said that he told the Americans that his government was ready to train and equip the Iraqi army and police to create "a new military and security structure."

Kazemi did not elaborate nor would he say how U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker responded.

The Baghdad talks were the first of their kind and a small sign that Washington thinks rapprochement with Iran is possible after more than a quarter-century of diplomatic estrangement that began with the 1979 Islamic revolution.

"The next meeting will occur in Iraq in less than one month," Kazemi told an Associated Press reporter after his news conference at the Iranian Embassy.

Crocker earlier said the Iraqis planned to propose a second session and that the United States would decide upon a follow-on meeting when the invitation was issued.

"We will consider that when we receive it," Crocker told reporters in the U.S.-controlled Green Zone. "The purpose of this meeting was not to arrange other meetings."

Crocker described the session as businesslike and said Iran proposed setting up a "trilateral security mechanism" that would include the U.S., Iraq and Iran, an idea he said would require study in Washington.

The U.S. envoy also said he told the Iranians their country needed to stop arming, funding and training the militants. The Iranians laid out their policy toward Iraq, Crocker said, describing it as "very similar to our own policy and what the Iraqi government have set out as their own guiding principles."

He added: "This is about actions not just principles, and I laid out to the Iranians direct, specific concerns about their behavior in Iraq and their support for militias that are fighting Iraqi and coalition forces."

Kazemi did not raise the subject of seven Iranians now in American custody in Iran, Crocker said: "The focus of our discussions were Iraq and Iraq only."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), who was criticized by the White House for her trip to Syria — also a U.S. rival — praised the Bush administration for holding Monday's talks.

"I think it's very important, and at the end of the day we want to know that every remedy, every diplomatic remedy has been exhausted," she said in Berlin.

The talks were held at Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's Green Zone office.

Al-Maliki did not attend the meeting, but the prime minister greeted the two ambassadors, who shook hands, and led them into a conference room, where the ambassadors sat across from each other.

Before leaving, al-Maliki told both sides that Iraqis wanted a stable country free of foreign forces and regional interference. The country should not be turned into a base for terrorist groups, he said. He also said that the U.S.-led forces in Iraq were only here to help build up the army and police and the country would not be used as a launching ground for a U.S. attack on a neighbor, a clear reference to Iran.

"We are sure that securing progress in this meeting would, without doubt, enhance the bridges of trust between the two countries and create a positive atmosphere" that would help them deal with other issues, he said.

Speaking in Tehran, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said the United States should admit its Middle East policy has failed.

"We are hopeful that Washington's realistic approach to the current issues of Iraq by confessing its failed policy in Iraq and the region and by showing a determination to changing the policy guarantees success of the talks and possible further talks," Mottaki said.

Monday's talks, as predicted, had a pinpoint focus: What Washington and Iran — separately or together — could do to contain the sectarian conflagration in Iraq.

"The American side has accusations against Iran and the Iranian side has some remarks on the presence of the American forces on Iraqi lands, which they see as a threat to their government," said Ali al-Dabagh, an Iraqi government spokesman.

But much more encumbered the narrow agenda — primarily Iran's nuclear program and Iranian fears that the Bush administration will seek regime change in Tehran as it did against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Washington and its Sunni Arab allies, on their side, are deeply unnerved by growing Iranian influence in the Middle East and the spread of increasingly radical Islam.

Compounding all that is Iran's open hostility to Israel.

Other issues clouding the talks included U.S. Navy exercises in the Persian Gulf last week and tough talk from President Bush about new U.N. penalties over the Iranian nuclear program. The United States says Iran is trying to build a bomb; Iran says it needs nuclear technology for energy production.

Further complicating the talks, Iran said Saturday it had uncovered spy rings organized by the United States and its Western allies.

U.S., Iran resume public talks for first time in 28 years

Monday, May 28, 2007
The Associated Press

Iran and the United States resumed public diplomacy Monday for the first time in more than a quarter century.

The meeting, in Baghdad between ambassadors, on security in Iraq could produce a chapter in world history for its success or a footnote for its failure.

U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker represented Washington. Iranian Ambassador Hassan Kazemi Qomi spoke for Iran at the talks, which were held at Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's office in the Green Zone compound in Baghdad.

Just before 10:30 a.m., al-Maliki greeted the two ambassadors, who shook hands, and led them into a conference room, where the ambassadors sat across the table from each other. Al-Maliki then made a brief statement and left the room.

He told both sides that Iraqis want a stable country free of foreign forces and regional interference. The country should not be turned into a base for terrorist groups, he said. He also said that the U.S.-led forces in Iraq were only here to help build up the army and police and the country would not be used as a launching ground for a U.S. attack on a neighbour, a clear reference to Iran.
'Enhance the bridges of trust'

"We are sure that securing progress in this meeting would, without doubt, enhance the bridges of trust between the two countries and create a positive atmosphere" that would help them deal with other issues, he said.

Speaking in Tehran, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Monday the talks could lead to future meetings, but only if Washington acknowledges that its Middle East policy has not been successful.

"We are hopeful that Washington's realistic approach to the current issues of Iraq by confessing its failed policy in Iraq and the region and by showing a determination to changing the policy guarantees success of the talks and possible further talks," Mottaki said.
Talks focus on Iraq

Monday's talks were to have a pinpoint focus: What Washington and Tehran — separately or together — could do to contain the sectarian conflagration in Iraq.

Washington wants Tehran to stop arming, financing and training militants, particularly Shia militias that are fighting American and Iraqi troops. Tehran wants Washington out of Iraq, period.

But much more encumbers the narrow agenda, primarily Iran's nuclear program and more than a quarter-century of diplomatic estrangement after the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran.

Further, the Iranian Shia theocracy fears the Bush administration harbours plans for regime change in Tehran and could act on those desires as it did against Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Iraq hopes to play mediator role

Washington and its Sunni Arab allies, on their side, are deeply unnerved by growing Iranian influence in the Middle East and the spread of increasingly radical Islam.

Compounding all that is Iran's open hostility to Israel.

A political aide to al-Maliki told the Associated Press that Iraq hoped to play a mediator's role in easing tensions between the Americans and Iranians, which Iraqi officials have routinely said are being played out in Iraq.

Many small issues could cloud the talks before they begin. There were U.S. Navy exercises in the Persian Gulf last week and tough talk from President Bush about new UN penalties against Tehran over its nuclear program. The United States says Tehran is trying to build a bomb, while Iran says it needs nuclear technology for energy production.

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۴, جمعه

Iraq Dominates PEJ’s First Quarterly NCI Report

Cable News

Looking more closely at the cable universe itself—among the three channels as well as across day parts—PEJ found distinct differences between the three channels, far more than discerned between the three commercial network channels or newspapers.

As an example, we found that coverage of the three biggest stories of the quarter—Iraq policy debate, the 2008 campaign and Anna Nicole Smith differed greatly across the three channels and day parts.

Overall, MSNBC and CNN were much more consumed with the war in Iraq than was Fox. MSNBC, for instance, devoted nearly a third of the time studied to the war (26% on the policy debate, 3% on events on the ground and 2% the homefront). Fox, by contrast, spent less than half that much time on the war—15% in all, (10% on the policy debate, 3% on events in Iraq and 1% on the homefront).

Percent of Newshole Devoted Three Major Stories on Cable TV
Dec. 31, '06 - Mar. 31, '07


Iraq War Total
(all 3 threads)

2008 Presidential Campaign

Anna Nicole Smith

CNN

25

7

4

Fox News

15

9

10

MSNBC

31

14

6

All Cable

23%

9%

7%

On CNN, Iraq coverage totaled 25%, again mostly focused on policy debate (14%). Events on the ground received 7% of the coverage (coming in second overall) while the homefront trailed at 3%.

MSNBC also spent more time on the presidential campaign than its rivals (14%), compared with 9% on Fox and 7% on CNN.

If Fox was less focused on the Iraq War, what took its place? Mostly—according to the numbers—Anna Nicole Smith. Coverage of her death trailed just barely the airtime spent on the Iraq policy debate, accounting for 9.6% of all the Fox content studied (versus 10.1% for the Iraq policy debate). Fox also stood out for its lack of coverage on the firings of the U.S. attorneys, compared with the other channels. The story, which gained real momentum in mid March, consumed a mere 2% of Fox’s total airtime. CNN devoted twice that percent (4%) and MSNBC four times (8%).

Another interesting comparison is the percent of time devoted to just a few big stories. On MSNBC, more than half of its programming consisted of just four stories. On CNN and Fox, it wasn’t until the 9th and 11th stories respectively that we reached 49%.

Moreover, MSNBC’s four top stories reveal something about the network’s identity. The perennial third-place finisher in the cable news ratings race sometimes seemed to struggle in trying to create a coherent identity and niche. Officials recently stated their intention to focus on Washington politics and policy. The study demonstrates that strategy.

The network’s top four stories—the Iraq policy debate, the 2008 campaign, the fired U.S. attorneys, and the Valerie Plame leak/Scooter Libby trial—are all, at their core, about Washington and politics. When added together, they accounted for 55% of MSNBC’s total coverage. (The same four stories filled 26% of the Fox News Channel’s airtime and 27% of CNN’s newshole.)That emphasis on Beltway topics is even more obvious in a prime-time MSNBC lineup of hosts that includes former Jimmy Carter speechwriter Chris Matthews, outspoken liberal Keith Olbermann, veteran conservative host Tucker Carlson, and former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of MSNBC’s prime time airtime was consumed by those four stories in the first part of 2007. When it comes to the Fox News Channel, there has long been a debate in media circles about whether the cable ratings leader has a clear conservative tilt or whether it is an antidote to a media landscape dominated by liberals. That argument is beyond of the scope of this report, but Fox gave considerably less coverage than its rivals to two subjects that were largely bad news for the Bush administration—the war in Iraq and the U.S. attorneys scandal.

Cable Coverage of Select Stories
Percent of Newshole,

Dec. 31, '06 - Mar. 31, '07

Iraq War U.S. Attorneys
Fox News 15% 2%
CNN 25% 4%
MSNBC 31% 8%

Aside from its high level of interest in the Anna Nicole Smith saga, one of Fox’s other top-10 stories (that did not make either CNN’s or MSNBC’s list) was a sensational crime tale. The network devoted 2% of its total airtime to the January tale of two Missouri teenage boys who were abducted and ultimately rescued from a man now charged with kidnapping, sodomy and attempted murder.

It is harder to characterize CNN—which fell in the first quarter of 2007 somewhere in between the Fox News Channel and MSNBC in its story selection. The one area of obvious distinction was the network’s emphasis on the immigration debate, which was its sixth biggest story at 4%. The subject was not among MSNBC’s top-10 story list and Fox devoted only 2% of its coverage to the topic. CNN’s attention to the issue stems from the relentless coverage by Lou Dobbs, the host of the network’s 6 pm show, and an outspoken advocate for stricter enforcement of immigration laws. More than one-third (35%) of all immigrations stories—across all the media studied—appeared on the Lou Dobbs’ show.

Cable Differences by Daypart

There are also noticeable differences in cable news depending on the time of day.

Overall, the three channels were much more distinct from each other in the daytime hours. Each had a different top story in the first quarter of the year. Fox viewers were most likely to learn about Anna Nicole (17%), while MSNBC talked primarily about the upcoming elections (16%) and CNN spent most time on Iraq policy debate (11%).

Again, MSNBC stood out here for spending more time on just a few stories, a narrower or more focused or targeted agenda. The top three stories—the campaign, Iraq policy and Anna Nicole Smith—amounted to 41% of all the daytime programming studied, versus about 25% devoted to the top three stories on Fox and CNN.

Percent of Newshole Devoted Three Major Stories on Cable TV
Dec. 31, '06 - Mar. 31, '07


Iraq War Total (all 3 threads)

2008 Presidential Campaign

Anna Nicole Smith

Cable Daytime

15%

7%

11%

CNN

20

2

5

Fox News

6

5

17

MSNBC

18

16

10

Cable Evening

25%

10%

6%

CNN

26

8

4

Fox News

17

10

8

MSNBC

36

13

4

In the later programs, the biggest difference was in the degree of emphasis, rather than in the selection of stories themselves. All three channels led with the Iraq policy debate, but MSNBC spent more than twice as much of its airtime (30%) on the subject than Fox (12%) or CNN (15%). The second story was also the same across channels—the 2008 elections—again with MSNBC devoting a greater percent to the topic than the other two (13% versus 10% for Fox and 8% for CNN). After that, the three channels diverged. Fox continued it primetime focus on Anna Nicole (8%), while CNN moved to events in Iraq (7%) and MSNBC talked about the fired U.S. attorneys (10%).

Iran ambassador to Iraq leads Monday talks with US



25/05/2007


TEHRAN, (Reuters) - Tehran's ambassador to Iraq will lead the Iranian delegation in talks with U.S. officials in Iraq on Monday to discuss stability in the country, Iran's Foreign Ministry said on Friday.

It is a rare face-to-face meeting between the arch-enemies who broke ties shortly after the 1979 Islamic revolution in Iran that toppled the U.S.-backed Shah. "Hassan Kazemi-Qomi will lead the Iranian delegation for talks with America's representative about Iraq's security," ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini said. "The talks will start on Monday."

Iran has said the talks, being held at the request of Iraqi leaders, would focus on Iraq's situation, dismissing the possibility of discussing other issues, including Iran's disputed nuclear programme.

The United States accuses Iran of fomenting violence in Iraq by backing Shi'ite militia in the neighbouring country and of providing weapons and the technology for new versions of roadside bombs used to kill American troops.

Tehran denies the charges and accuses Washington of igniting tension between Iraq's Shi'ite and Sunni Muslims.

Iran is locked in a standoff with the West over its atomic programme. Washington accuses Tehran of wanting nuclear weapons.

Iran says it needs nuclear technology only to generate electricity.

۱۳۸۶ خرداد ۱, سه‌شنبه

Pelosi: ‘I’m Not Likely To Vote For Something That Doesn’t Have A Timetable’

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) confirmed at a press conference late this afternoon that she does not intend to vote for the Iraq deal reached today by the White House and Congress. “I’m not likely to vote for something that doesn’t have a timetable or a goal,” she said, while still praising the deal as “a recognition by the administration that a new direction was called for by the American people.”

Later, House Appropriations Chairman David Obey (D-WI) insisted that “we intend to continue that fight” for an Iraq timeline “on every vehicle available to us,” adding that the “first two vehicles that we expect to join the issue on are the defense appropriations bill in July and the defense supplemental appropriations bill in September.”

Watch it:

Also during the press conference, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) called the deal “the beginning of the end of the president’s policy in Iraq,” citing the 18 benchmarks and two required ‘progress reports’ laid out in the legislation. Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), the House Majority Whip, pointed out that the bill will allow for passage of the first minimum wage increase in a decade, and for more than $6 billion to be delivered to victims of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma.

Iran's secret plan for summer offensive to force US out of Iraq

Simon Tisdall
Tuesday May 22, 2007
The Guardian

US soldiers visit an Iraqi army base in Amiriya, a Sunni neighbourhood in west Baghdad
US soldiers visit an Iraqi army base in Amiriya, a Sunni neighbourhood in west Baghdad. Photograph: Sean Smith


Iran is secretly forging ties with al-Qaida elements and Sunni Arab militias in Iraq in preparation for a summer showdown with coalition forces intended to tip a wavering US Congress into voting for full military withdrawal, US officials say.

"Iran is fighting a proxy war in Iraq and it's a very dangerous course for them to be following. They are already committing daily acts of war against US and British forces," a senior US official in Baghdad warned. "They [Iran] are behind a lot of high-profile attacks meant to undermine US will and British will, such as the rocket attacks on Basra palace and the Green Zone [in Baghdad]. The attacks are directed by the Revolutionary Guard who are connected right to the top [of the Iranian government]."

The official said US commanders were bracing for a nationwide, Iranian-orchestrated summer offensive, linking al-Qaida and Sunni insurgents to Tehran's Shia militia allies, that Iran hoped would trigger a political mutiny in Washington and a US retreat. "We expect that al-Qaida and Iran will both attempt to increase the propaganda and increase the violence prior to Petraeus's report in September [when the US commander General David Petraeus will report to Congress on President George Bush's controversial, six-month security "surge" of 30,000 troop reinforcements]," the official said.

"Certainly it [the violence] is going to pick up from their side. There is significant latent capability in Iraq, especially Iranian-sponsored capability. They can turn it up whenever they want. You can see that from the pre-positioning that's been going on and the huge stockpiles of Iranian weapons that we've turned up in the last couple of months. The relationships between Iran and groups like al-Qaida are very fluid," the official said.

"It often comes down to individuals, and people constantly move around. For instance, the Sunni Arab so-called resistance groups use Salafi jihadist ideology for their own purposes. But the whole Iran- al-Qaida linkup is very sinister."

Iran has maintained close links to Iraq's Shia political parties and militias but has previously eschewed collaboration with al-Qaida and Sunni insurgents.

US officials now say they have firm evidence that Tehran has switched tack as it senses a chance of victory in Iraq. In a parallel development, they say they also have proof that Iran has reversed its previous policy in Afghanistan and is now supporting and supplying the Taliban's campaign against US, British and other Nato forces.

Tehran's strategy to discredit the US surge and foment a decisive congressional revolt against Mr Bush is national in scope and not confined to the Shia south, its traditional sphere of influence, the senior official in Baghdad said. It included stepped-up coordination with Shia militias such as Moqtada al-Sadr's Jaish al-Mahdi as well as Syrian-backed Sunni Arab groups and al-Qaida in Mesopotamia, he added. Iran was also expanding contacts across the board with paramilitary forces and political groups, including Kurdish parties such as the PUK, a US ally.

"Their strategy takes into account all these various parties. Iran is playing all these different factions to maximise its future control and maximise US and British difficulties. Their co-conspirator is Syria which is allowing the takfirists [fundamentalist Salafi jihadis] to come across the border," the official said.

Any US decision to retaliate against Iran on its own territory could be taken only at the highest political level in Washington, the official said. But he indicated that American patience was wearing thin.

Warning that the US was "absolutely determined" to hit back hard wherever it was challenged by Iranian proxies or agents inside Iraq, he cited the case of five alleged members of the Revolutionary Guard's al-Quds force detained in Irbil in January. Despite strenuous protests from Tehran, which claims the men are diplomats, they have still not been released.

"Tehran is behaving like a racecourse gambler. They're betting on all the horses in the race, even on people they fundamentally don't trust," a senior administration official in Washington said. "They don't know what the outcome will be in Iraq. So they're hedging their bets."

The administration official also claimed that notwithstanding recent US and British overtures, Syria was still collaborating closely with Iran's strategy in Iraq.

"80% to 90%" of the foreign jihadis entering Iraq were doing so from Syrian territory, he said.

Despite recent diplomatic contacts, and an agreement to hold bilateral talks at ambassadorial level in Baghdad next week, US officials say there has been no let-up in hostile Iranian activities, including continuing support for violence, weapons smuggling and training.

"Iran is perpetuating the cycle of sectarian violence through support for extra-judicial killing and murder cells. They bring Iraqi militia members and insurgent groups into Iran for training and then help infiltrate them back into the country. We have plenty of evidence from a variety of sources. There's no argument about that. That's just a fact," the senior official in Baghdad said.

In trying to force an American retreat, Iran's hardline leadership also hoped to bring about a humiliating political and diplomatic defeat for the US that would reduce Washington's regional influence while increasing Tehran's own.

But if Iran succeeded in "prematurely" driving US and British forces out of Iraq, the likely result would be a "colossal humanitarian disaster" and possible regional war drawing in the Sunni Arab Gulf states, Syria and Turkey, he said.

Despite such concerns, or because of them, the US welcomed the chance to talk to Iran, the senior administration official said. "Our agenda starts with force protection in Iraq," he said. But there were many other Iraq-related issues to be discussed. Recent pressure had shown that Iran's behaviour could be modified, the official claimed: "Last winter they were literally getting away with murder."

But tougher action by security forces in Iraq against Iranian agents and networks, the dispatch of an additional aircraft carrier group to the Gulf and UN security council resolutions imposing sanctions had given Tehran pause, he said.

Washington analysts and commentators predict that Gen Petraeus's report to the White House and Congress in early September will be a pivotal moment in the history of the four-and-a-half-year war - and a decision to begin a troop drawdown or continue with the surge policy will hinge on the outcome. Most Democrats and many Republicans in Congress believe Iraq is in the grip of a civil war and that there is little that a continuing military presence can achieve. "Political will has already failed. It's over," a former Bush administration official said.

A senior adviser to Gen Petraeus reported this month that the surge had reduced violence, especially sectarian killings, in the Baghdad area and Sunni-dominated Anbar province. But the adviser admitted that much of the trouble had merely moved elsewhere, "resulting in spikes of activity in Diyala [to the north] and some areas to the south of the capital". "Overall violence is at about the same level [as when the surge began in February]."

Iranian officials flatly deny US and British allegations of involvement in internal violence in Iraq or in attacks on coalition forces. Interviewed in Tehran recently, Mohammad Reza Bagheri, deputy foreign minister for Arab affairs with primary responsibility for Iran's policy in Iraq, said: "We believe it would be to the benefit of both the occupiers and the Iraqi people that they [the coalition forces] withdraw immediately."