اهداف جامعه ایرانی چیست؟ « ما چگونه فکر می کنیم» و آنچه که در ایران مهم انگاشته می شود.

۱۳۸۶ بهمن ۲۰, شنبه

Sandia’s Sunshine to Petrol project seeks fuel from thin air

December 5, 2007

Team to chemically transform carbon dioxide into carbon-neutral liquid fuels

Sandia researcher Rich Diver assembles a prototype device intended to chemically reenergize carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide, which ultimately could become the building block to synthesize a liquid combustible fuel. Sandia researcher Rich Diver assembles a prototype device intended to chemically reenergize carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide, which ultimately could become the building block to synthesize a liquid combustible fuel. (Photo by Randy Montoya)
Download 300dpi JPEG image (Media are welcome to download/publish this image with related news stories.)

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. —Using concentrated solar energy to reverse combustion, a research team from Sandia National Laboratories is building a prototype device intended to chemically “reenergize” carbon dioxide into carbon monoxide using concentrated solar power. The carbon monoxide could then be used to make hydrogen or serve as a building block to synthesize a liquid combustible fuel, such as methanol or even gasoline, diesel and jet fuel.

The prototype device, called the Counter Rotating Ring Receiver Reactor Recuperator (CR5, for short), will break a carbon-oxygen bond in the carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide and oxygen in two distinct steps. It is a major piece of an approach to converting carbon dioxide into fuel from sunlight.

The Sandia research team calls this approach “Sunshine to Petrol” (S2P). “Liquid Solar Fuel” is the end product — the methanol, gasoline, or other liquid fuel made from water and the carbon monoxide produced using solar energy.

Sandia is a National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) laboratory.

CR5 inventor Rich Diver says the original idea for the device was to break down water into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen could then fuel a potential hydrogen economy.

The Sandia researchers came up with the idea to use the CR5 to break down carbon dioxide, just as it would water. Over the past year they have shown proof of concept and are completing a prototype device that will use concentrated solar energy to reenergize carbon dioxide or water, the products of combustion. This will form carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and oxygen, which ultimately could be used to synthesize liquid fuels in an integrated S2P system.

Coresearchers on the project are Jim E. Miller and Nathan Siegel. Project champion is Ellen B. Stechel, manager of Sandia’s Fuels and Energy Transitions Department.

Stechel says that researchers have known for a long time that theoretically it might be possible to recycle carbon dioxide, but many thought it could not be made practical, either technically or economically.

“Hence, it has not been pursued with much vigor,” she says. “Not only did we think it was possible, the team has developed a prototype that they fully anticipate will successfully break down carbon dioxide in a clever and viable two-step process.”

Stechel notes that one driver for the invention is the need to reduce greenhouse gases.

“This invention, though probably a good 15 to 20 years away from being on the market, holds a real promise of being able to reduce carbon dioxide emissions while preserving options to keep using fuels we know and love,” she says. “Recycling carbon dioxide into fuels provides an attractive alternative to burying it.”

Sandia researcher Rich Diver checks out the solar furnace which will be the initial source of concentrated solar heat for the CR5 prototype. Eventually parabolic dishes will provide the thermal energy.
Sandia researcher Rich Diver checks out the solar furnace which will be the initial source of concentrated solar heat for the CR5 prototype. Eventually parabolic dishes will provide the thermal energy.
(Photo by Randy Montoya)
Download 300dpi JPEG image (Media are welcome to download/publish this image with related news stories.)

Providing funding for Sunshine to Petrol is Sandia’s internal Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program. The research has also attracted interest and some funding from DoD/DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency).

“What’s exciting about this invention is that it will result in fossil fuels being used at least twice, meaning less carbon dioxide being put into the atmosphere and a reduction of the rate that fossil fuels are pulled out of the ground,” Diver says.

As an example, he says, coal would be burned at a clean coal power plant. The carbon dioxide from the burning of the coal would be captured and reduced to carbon monoxide in the CR5. The carbon monoxide would then be the starting point of making gasoline, jet fuel, methanol, or almost any type of liquid fuel.

The prospect of a liquid fuel is significant because it fits in with the current gasoline and oil infrastructure. After the synthesized fuel is made from the carbon monoxide, it could be transported through a pipeline or put in a truck and hauled to a gas station, just like gasoline refined from petroleum is now. Plus it would work in ordinary gasoline and diesel engine vehicles.

Miller says that while the first step would be to capture the carbon dioxide from sources where it is concentrated — e.g., power plants, smokestacks, and breweries — the ultimate goal would be to snatch it out of the air. A S2P system that includes atmospheric carbon dioxide capture could produce carbon-neutral liquid fuels.

“Our overall objective with this prototype is to demonstrate the practicality of the CR5 concept and to determine how test results from small-scale testing can be expanded to work in real devices,” Miller says. “The design is conservative compared to what might eventually be developed.”

Diver says the prototype should be completed by early next year. He hand-built the precision device in a shop at Sandia’s National Solar Thermal Test Facility and is now waiting on a few parts to finalize it. Initial tests will break down water into hydrogen and oxygen. That will be followed by tests that similarly break down carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide and oxygen.

Besides having a nearly completed prototype, the research team has already proven that the chemistry works repeatedly through multiple cycles without losing performance and on a short enough cycle time for a practical device.

“We just now have to do it all in one continuous working device,” Siegel says.

۱۳۸۶ بهمن ۱۲, جمعه

Microsoft offers $44 bn to buy Yahoo

January 31, 2008

Board of Directors
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Attention: Roy Bostock, Chairman
Attention: Jerry Yang, Chief Executive Officer

Dear Members of the Board:

I am writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Microsoft to make a proposal for a business combination of Microsoft and Yahoo!. Under our proposal, Microsoft would acquire all of the outstanding shares of Yahoo! common stock for per share consideration of $31 based on Microsoft’s closing share price on January 31, 2008, payable in the form of $31 in cash or 0.9509 of a share of Microsoft common stock. Microsoft would provide each Yahoo! shareholder with the ability to choose whether to receive the consideration in cash or Microsoft common stock, subject to pro-ration so that in the aggregate one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be exchanged for shares of Microsoft common stock and one-half of the Yahoo! common shares will be converted into the right to receive cash. Our proposal is not subject to any financing condition.

Our proposal represents a 62% premium above the closing price of Yahoo! common stock of $19.18 on January 31, 2008. The implied premium for the operating assets of the company clearly is considerably greater when adjusted for the minority, non-controlled assets and cash. By whatever financial measure you use - EBITDA, free cash flow, operating cash flow, net income, or analyst target prices - this proposal represents a compelling value realization event for your shareholders.

We believe that Microsoft common stock represents a very attractive investment opportunity for Yahoo!’s shareholders. Microsoft has generated revenue growth of 15%, earnings growth of 26%, and a return on equity of 35% on average for the last three years. Microsoft’s share price has generated shareholder returns of 8% during the last one year period and 28% during the last three year period, significantly outperforming the S&P 500. It is our view that Microsoft has significant potential upside given the continued solid growth in our core businesses, the recent launch of Windows Vista, and other strategic initiatives.

Microsoft’s consistent belief has been that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! clearly represents the best way to deliver maximum value to our respective shareholders, as well as create a more efficient and competitive company that would provide greater value and service to our customers. In late 2006 and early 2007, we jointly explored a broad range of ways in which our two companies might work together. These discussions were based on a vision that the online businesses of Microsoft and Yahoo! should be aligned in some way to create a more effective competitor in the online marketplace. We discussed a number of alternatives ranging from commercial partnerships to a merger proposal, which you rejected. While a commercial partnership may have made sense at one time, Microsoft believes that the only alternative now is the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! that we are proposing.

In February 2007, I received a letter from your Chairman indicating the view of the Yahoo! Board that “now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders to enter into discussions regarding an acquisition transaction.” According to that letter, the principal reason for this view was the Yahoo! Board’s confidence in the “potential upside” if management successfully executed on a reformulated strategy based on certain operational initiatives, such as Project Panama, and a significant organizational realignment. A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.

While online advertising growth continues, there are significant benefits of scale in advertising platform economics, in capital costs for search index build-out, and in research and development, making this a time of industry consolidation and convergence. Today, the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo! can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers, and publishers. Synergies of this combination fall into four areas:

Scale economics: This combination enables synergies related to scale economics of the advertising platform where today there is only one competitor at scale. This includes synergies across both search and non-search related advertising that will strengthen the value proposition to both advertisers and publishers. Additionally, the combination allows us to consolidate capital spending.

Expanded R&D capacity: The combined talent of our engineering resources can be focused on R&D priorities such as a single search index and single advertising platform. Together we can unleash new levels of innovation, delivering enhanced user experiences, breakthroughs in search, and new advertising platform capabilities. Many of these breakthroughs are a function of an engineering scale that today neither of our companies has on its own.

Operational efficiencies: Eliminating redundant infrastructure and duplicative operating costs will improve the financial performance of the combined entity.

Emerging user experiences: Our combined ability to focus engineering resources that drive innovation in emerging scenarios such as video, mobile services, online commerce, social media, and social platforms is greatly enhanced.

We would value the opportunity to further discuss with you how to optimize the integration of our respective businesses to create a leading global technology company with exceptional display and search advertising capabilities. You should also be aware that we intend to offer significant retention packages to your engineers, key leaders and employees across all disciplines.

We have dedicated considerable time and resources to an analysis of a potential transaction and are confident that the combination will receive all necessary regulatory approvals. We look forward to discussing this with you, and both our internal legal team and outside counsel are available to meet with your counsel at their earliest convenience.

Our proposal is subject to the negotiation of a definitive merger agreement and our having the opportunity to conduct certain limited and confirmatory due diligence. In addition, because a portion of the aggregate merger consideration would consist of Microsoft common stock, we would provide Yahoo! the opportunity to conduct appropriate limited due diligence with respect to Microsoft. We are prepared to deliver a draft merger agreement to you and begin discussions immediately.

In light of the significance of this proposal to your shareholders and ours, as well as the potential for selective disclosures, our intention is to publicly release the text of this letter tomorrow morning.

Due to the importance of these discussions and the value represented by our proposal, we expect the Yahoo! Board to engage in a full review of our proposal. My leadership team and I would be happy to make ourselves available to meet with you and your Board at your earliest convenience. Depending on the nature of your response, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!’s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.

We believe this proposal represents a unique opportunity to create significant value for Yahoo!’s shareholders and employees, and the combined company will be better positioned to provide an enhanced value proposition to users and advertisers. We hope that you and your Board share our enthusiasm, and we look forward to a prompt and favorable reply.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Steven A. Ballmer

Steven A. Ballmer

Chief Executive Officer

Microsoft Corporation

۱۳۸۶ بهمن ۱۰, چهارشنبه

انتقاد از حضور خلیلزاد در نشستی با متکی + ویدیو مذاکرات

'انتقاد از حضور خلیلزاد در نشستی با متکی'
مجتبی ثمره هاشمی، زلمی خلیلزاد، منوجهر متکی

کاخ سفید از حضور زلمی خلیلزاد، نماینده آمریکا در سازمان ملل در نشستی در داوس سوئیس با حضور منوچهر متکی، وزیر امور خارجه و مجتبی ثمره هاشمی، مشاور ارشد رئیس جمهور ایران انتقاد کرده است.

نیویورک تایمز و لس آنجلس تایمز، دو روزنامه مهم آمریکا امروز سی ژانویه در گزارش هایی به این موضوع پرداخته اند.

در این نشست مجمع جهانی اقتصاد در سوئیس که به سیاست خارجی ایران می پرداخت، به غیر از آقایان متکی، خلیلزاد و هاشمی ثمره، گرت اوانس از گروه بحران بین الملل که مدیریت جلسه را به عهده داشت، خالد عبدالله جناحی، عضو هیات مدیره بانک شامل بحرین و لیلیا شوتسووا از موسسه کارنگی حضور داشتند.

مناقشه هسته ای ایران، روابط ایران با همسایگان خود عراق و افغانستان، روابط با سوریه و لبنان، روابط با حماس و حزب الله، دیدگاه های ایران در مورد اسرائیل از جمله مسایلی است که در این نشست مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.

آمریکا با ایران رابطه دیپلماتیک ندارد و دولت جورج بوش، رئیس جمهور آمریکا به دنبال انزوای بیشتر ایران در عرصه بین المللی است.

روزنامه نیویورک تایمز به نقل از هلن کوپر، گزارشگر خود نوشته است که حضور زلمی خلیلزاد، نماینده آمریکا در سازمان با شگفتی مقام های دولت جورج بوش همراه شده است. این روزنامه نوشته است که مقام های آمریکایی هنگامی از حضور زلمی خلیلزاد در نشستی با منوچهر متکی خبردار شدند که ویدئوی این نشست در سایت یوتیوب منتشر شد.

نیویورک تایمز نوشته که نتوانسته است با آقای خلیلزاد برای اظهارنظر در این مورد ارتباط برقرار کند اما در ریچارد گرنل، سخنگوی او گفته است که حضور آقای خلیلزاد در این نشست در کنار مقام های ایرانی، در نشستی چندجانبه با حضور یک مجری بوده است.

آقای گرنل به نیویورک تایمز گفته است که هیج دیدار و مکالمه جداگانه ای در کار نبوده و طرفین با یکدیگر دست هم نداده اند.

این روزنامه خاطرنشان می کند که مقام های بلندپایه دولت بوش که نام آنها را فاش نکرده گفته اند که از این مساله خشمگین هستند.

مقام های آمریکایی هنگامی از حضور زلمی خلیلزاد در نشستی با منوچهر متکی خبردار شدند که ویدئوی این نشست در سایت یوتیوب منتشر شد
نیویورک تایمز

گزارشگر نیویورک تایمز نوشته که این ابراز خشم از حضور زلمی خلیلزاد در نشستی با حضور مقام های ارشد ایران نشاندهنده اختلاف نظرها و درگیری های درون دولت جورج بوش بر سر نحوه رفتار با ایران است.

به نوشته این روزنامه، بسیاری از مقام های وزارت خارجه آمریکا بر این باورند که آمریکا باید به صورت مستقیم و بدون پیش شرط وارد تعامل با ایران شود اما این رویکرد در کاخ سفید چندان مورد پسند نیست.

در نشست مورد نظر در داوس سوئیس، زلمی خلیلزاد در کنار آقای متکی نشسته بود و در سخنان خود تاکید کرد که فشارها بر ایران تا زمانی که این کشور، فعالیت های غنی سازی اورانیوم را متوقف نکرده، باید ادامه یابد.

روزنامه لس آنجلس تایمز نیز در گزارشی به قلم پل ریختر و مگی فرلی نوشته است که آقای خلیلزاد، بدون تائید مقام های بالاتر در این نشست شرکت کرده است.

این روزنامه نوشته که آقای خلیلزاد در این نشست مواضع دولت بوش را تکرار کرده اما مقررات و قوانین دولت این کشور در مورد محدود بودن دیدار با مقام های ایرانی را نقض کرده است.

یک سخنگوی وزارت خارجه آمریکا که هویت او فاش نشده به این روزنامه گفته است که حضور آقای خلیلزاد در این نشست بدون مجوز و هماهنگی بوده است.

زلمی خلیلزاد در فهرست مهمانان نشست داوس حضور نداشت و به نظر در لحظات آخر به آن اضافه شده است
لس آنجلس تایمز

به گفته این سخنگو، مقام های وزارت خارجه آمریکا در مورد این مساله با آقای خلیلزاد صحبت خواهند کرد.

لس آنجلس تایمز نوشته که زلمی خلیلزاد در فهرست مهمانان این نشست حضور نداشت و به نظر در لحظات آخر به آن اضافه شده است.

زلمی خلیلزاد پیش از عهده دار شدن نمایندگی آمریکا در سازمان ملل، سفیر آمریکا در افغانستان و عراق بود و در این سمت های خود با مقام های ایرانی ارتباط داشت


.